Editorial policy

Grand Screen Journal aims to make screen craft clear without flattening the many ways a work can be understood. We separate what can be observed from what we infer, and we make room for correction when our wording or facts fall short.

Accuracy and interpretation

We check factual statements against material appropriate to the subject and take care with names, dates and technical terms. Interpretive writing is presented as interpretation, not as the only possible reading. If a claim is uncertain or the available context is limited, we say so plainly.

Independence

Editorial decisions are made for readers, not as a promise of favourable coverage. A collaboration or commercial relationship does not determine our conclusions, and we do not let a partner approve editorial judgement.

Corrections

Readers may use the Contact page to identify a possible error. We review the point, amend material when warranted and clarify substantial corrections so readers can understand what changed.

Partner and commissioned material

Paid placements and material created in collaboration with a partner are labelled clearly where they appear. Labels are intended to let readers distinguish partner material from independent editorial work.